🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," said one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful online content contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.